Reason for change: This change was to make it clear that the county intends to review the plan periodically to ensure that the policies of the plan continue to reflect the values and conditions of the community. There are no featured reviews for Final Draft because the movie has not released yet ().The following statement has been added in the Executive Summary and at the beginning of the Implementation chapter: “This plan should be viewed as a “living document” and as such should be reviewed no more than 10 years from the adoption of this plan.”.Reason for change: This change was to provide additional flexibility when developing the precise standards for Conservation Subdivisions so that they will produce optimal results.Giving feedback also helps us grow because we get better at noticing how.
REVIEW FINAL DRAFT 10 HOW TO
Getting feedback on how well we’re doing something and how to improve is one of the most powerful ways to learn and growas writers or anything else. on page 21 has been revised from “The size of individual lots within conservation subdivisions should not be less than 1 acre.” to state “Standards regarding the size of individual lots, the percentage of open space required, and setback requirements from surrounding properties and roadways should be developed, with the overall goal being to minimize the visual impact of subdivisions and to emphasize rural character.” Becoming a Better Writer by Helping Other Writers. In other words, the context of the road and its classification (local, collector, arterial) should be taken into account. Reason for change: This change was to clarify the language so that one could not misconstrue this policy as to the type of roadway improvements that would be made in a rural area.
![review final draft 10 review final draft 10](https://s2.studylib.net/store/data/015383524_1-cb4ee13a98a55de88635e3c505d6012f-768x994.png)
![review final draft 10 review final draft 10](https://www.awn.com/sites/default/files/styles/large_featured/public/image/featured/1031026-final-draft-releases-final-draft-10.jpg)
![review final draft 10 review final draft 10](https://storage.googleapis.com/squibler-wordpress-public-bucket/1/2019/09/tagging-1024x719.jpg)
narrower widths, drainage swales, shade trees, etc.)” to state “Roadways should be designed to standards appropriate for their classification, level of service, and surrounding context.”